# Feature

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/c/contribute/feature/2.md?page=259&state=muted

[최신](https://meta.discourse.org/latest.md) · [카테고리](https://meta.discourse.org/categories.md) · [태그](https://meta.discourse.org/tags.md)

**Page:** 260

---

## [Staff should not see user profile email addresses without a click](https://meta.discourse.org/t/staff-should-not-see-user-profile-email-addresses-without-a-click/18871)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)\
**댓글:** 11\
**마지막 업데이트:** [10월 4, 2014, 11:53오전 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/staff-should-not-see-user-profile-email-addresses-without-a-click/18871 "2014-10-04T11:53:55Z")

</div>

Continuing the discussion from Last post versus seen timestamps: I agree with this. Staff shouldn’t see emails unless they explicitly click to expand the email (e.g. they need to see it for some reason) and this action…

---

## [Onebox: for Github Issue](https://meta.discourse.org/t/onebox-for-github-issue/20275)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@Lid](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Lid)\
**댓글:** 1\
**마지막 업데이트:** [10월 4, 2014, 11:46오전 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/onebox-for-github-issue/20275 "2014-10-04T11:46:57Z")

</div>

https://github.com/discourse/onebox/pull/235 There is a minor fix pending to be merged for this feature to work on next deployment. Image preview

---

## [Deleted posts will now be collapsed by default](https://meta.discourse.org/t/deleted-posts-will-now-be-collapsed-by-default/17699)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@riking](https://meta.discourse.org/u/riking)\
**댓글:** 2\
**마지막 업데이트:** [10월 4, 2014, 11:40오전 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/deleted-posts-will-now-be-collapsed-by-default/17699 "2014-10-04T11:40:03Z")

</div>

Hey everyone - this topic is an announcement for a feature that just hit master. Also, this only applies to forum admins/staff - if you aren’t staff, you won’t notice any of this. Once you update the next time, you shou…

---

## [Replacing Mailing lists: Email-In](https://meta.discourse.org/t/replacing-mailing-lists-email-in/13099)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@lightyear](https://meta.discourse.org/u/lightyear)\
**댓글:** 66\
**마지막 업데이트:** [10월 4, 2014, 11:37오전 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/replacing-mailing-lists-email-in/13099 "2014-10-04T11:37:17Z")

</div>

Hello everyone, Update: I’ve finished developing this. You can find the entire patchset at the pull-request with the three features as three commits in the same order. I am on the quest on supporting discourse to repla…

---

## [Customize social networks sites to share](https://meta.discourse.org/t/customize-social-networks-sites-to-share/13597)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@oSiNaReF](https://meta.discourse.org/u/oSiNaReF)\
**댓글:** 8\
**마지막 업데이트:** [10월 4, 2014, 10:35오전 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/customize-social-networks-sites-to-share/13597 "2014-10-04T10:35:24Z")

</div>

Reading this https://meta.discourse.org/t/sharing-to-social-networks/3164 I think that it could be more social Discourse, adding more social networks, like reddit, meneame, wk, but the problem is that there are a lot o…

---

## [Check a box in post editor to prevent edit bump](https://meta.discourse.org/t/check-a-box-in-post-editor-to-prevent-edit-bump/13544)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@James\_B](https://meta.discourse.org/u/James_B)\
**댓글:** 11\
**마지막 업데이트:** [10월 4, 2014, 4:17오전 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/check-a-box-in-post-editor-to-prevent-edit-bump/13544 "2014-10-04T04:17:29Z")

</div>

I did not find anything like this so far. This is a feature suggestion to include a new checkbox in the post editor that will prevent the topic from getting bumped after saving the edit. The thread title could still be …

---

## [Punitive measures against idiots - locking trust level](https://meta.discourse.org/t/punitive-measures-against-idiots-locking-trust-level/20549)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@Lee\_Ars](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Lee_Ars)\
**댓글:** 17\
**마지막 업데이트:** [10월 3, 2014, 3:39오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/punitive-measures-against-idiots-locking-trust-level/20549 "2014-10-03T15:39:30Z")

</div>

Had a dipshit user register and power-level himself up to trust level 1, then begin sending inane PMs and posting inane messages to threads. Rather than allow flags to accumulate, I’d rather take direct action. Banning’s…

---

## [Support auto-highlighting for preformatted code](https://meta.discourse.org/t/support-auto-highlighting-for-preformatted-code/14234)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@Naatan](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Naatan)\
**댓글:** 11\
**마지막 업데이트:** [10월 1, 2014, 8:42오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/support-auto-highlighting-for-preformatted-code/14234 "2014-10-01T20:42:05Z")

</div>

Highlightjs offers “auto highlighting” out of the box. It’d be nice if this functionality could be exposed to Discourse through an admin pref (eg. “Auto highlight preformatted code”). I understand this won’t be relevant …

---

## [Suppress images for short emails](https://meta.discourse.org/t/suppress-images-for-short-emails/20235)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@techAPJ](https://meta.discourse.org/u/techAPJ)\
**댓글:** 9\
**마지막 업데이트:** [10월 1, 2014, 7:41오전 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/suppress-images-for-short-emails/20235 "2014-10-01T07:41:14Z")

</div>

To prevent Discourse emails being detected as spam, we should suppress images from short emails (having text length 2800 Bytes or less). Currently short emails with images are detected as spam by Apache SpamAssassin, du…

---

## [In read-only mode changing the settings fails silently](https://meta.discourse.org/t/in-read-only-mode-changing-the-settings-fails-silently/20623)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@tpokorra](https://meta.discourse.org/u/tpokorra)\
**댓글:** 3\
**마지막 업데이트:** [9월 30, 2014, 7:01오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/in-read-only-mode-changing-the-settings-fails-silently/20623 "2014-09-30T19:01:13Z")

</div>

This is probably related to https://meta.discourse.org/t/read-only-mode-bugs/12708. I tried to set in the settings, Backups, allow restore. But it did not allow to save it. Because there is no error message, I first th…

---

## ["Questionable" account checks at the time of signup?](https://meta.discourse.org/t/questionable-account-checks-at-the-time-of-signup/19068)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@brodock](https://meta.discourse.org/u/brodock)\
**댓글:** 8\
**마지막 업데이트:** [9월 29, 2014, 10:04오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/questionable-account-checks-at-the-time-of-signup/19068 "2014-09-29T22:04:51Z")

</div>

Why do that, when you can use “Project Honeypot”, that does it in a much better, distributed way. We can also check IP address during the registration, to require admin approval: The best part is that you do all the c…

---

## [Emoticons should not count toward the post character minimum](https://meta.discourse.org/t/emoticons-should-not-count-toward-the-post-character-minimum/20503)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@AdamCapriola](https://meta.discourse.org/u/AdamCapriola)\
**댓글:** 12\
**마지막 업데이트:** [9월 29, 2014, 9:41오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/emoticons-should-not-count-toward-the-post-character-minimum/20503 "2014-09-29T21:41:41Z")

</div>

:smile: :stuck\_out\_tongue:

---

## [Mobile option to not load user avatars (and other potential bandwidth saving features)](https://meta.discourse.org/t/mobile-option-to-not-load-user-avatars-and-other-potential-bandwidth-saving-features/17792)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@daybreaker](https://meta.discourse.org/u/daybreaker)\
**댓글:** 6\
**마지막 업데이트:** [9월 27, 2014, 6:57오전 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/mobile-option-to-not-load-user-avatars-and-other-potential-bandwidth-saving-features/17792 "2014-09-27T06:57:00Z")

</div>

We recently released our Discourse forum to replace our self-built mini-forum app, and some users are up in arms over the mobile version not being as friendly (personally, I dont see how they can prefer our terrible self…

---

## [Resend any email](https://meta.discourse.org/t/resend-any-email/20502)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@watchmanmonitor](https://meta.discourse.org/u/watchmanmonitor)\
**댓글:** 1\
**마지막 업데이트:** [9월 26, 2014, 7:41오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/resend-any-email/20502 "2014-09-26T19:41:42Z")

</div>

Continuing the discussion from Re-inviting/resending invites to users?: I’m sure that having a “resend” next to any of the emails here could be a very handy troubleshooting tool. Feature requested.

---

## [What happens when you flag a post?](https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-happens-when-you-flag-a-post/20473)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@AdamCapriola](https://meta.discourse.org/u/AdamCapriola)\
**댓글:** 2\
**마지막 업데이트:** [9월 25, 2014, 8:45오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-happens-when-you-flag-a-post/20473 "2014-09-25T20:45:10Z")

</div>

I’m having trouble understanding what exactly happens or is expected to happen when posts get flagged. I have issues on my forums with users posting unhelpful, spammy content (not spam as in the sense that Discourse term…

---

## [Editing a post should make the grey unread count appear in the topic list](https://meta.discourse.org/t/editing-a-post-should-make-the-grey-unread-count-appear-in-the-topic-list/17418)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@probus](https://meta.discourse.org/u/probus)\
**댓글:** 9\
**마지막 업데이트:** [9월 25, 2014, 6:00오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/editing-a-post-should-make-the-grey-unread-count-appear-in-the-topic-list/17418 "2014-09-25T18:00:16Z")

</div>

Here’s something that has been bugging me for a while. Edited posts should make the grey unread count appear in the topic list so you know there is something you haven’t read in that topic. This is especially important …

---

## [Flagged Contented that is Temporarily Hidden is still visible](https://meta.discourse.org/t/flagged-contented-that-is-temporarily-hidden-is-still-visible/19212)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@cpradio](https://meta.discourse.org/u/cpradio)\
**댓글:** 18\
**마지막 업데이트:** [9월 25, 2014, 5:53오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/flagged-contented-that-is-temporarily-hidden-is-still-visible/19212 "2014-09-25T17:53:16Z")

</div>

I’m not sure if this is a bug or the lack of my understanding of “hidden”. I am an anonymous user, I visit a topic that has a hidden post, because it was flagged by the community and I see: “This post was flagged by th…

---

## [Avoid "naughty" words in avatar list](https://meta.discourse.org/t/avoid-naughty-words-in-avatar-list/20438)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@supermathie](https://meta.discourse.org/u/supermathie)\
**댓글:** 5\
**마지막 업데이트:** [9월 25, 2014, 6:52오전 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/avoid-naughty-words-in-avatar-list/20438 "2014-09-25T06:52:58Z")

</div>

A bug… debatably. This one is pretty innocent, but I could easily see worse words being spelled out:

---

## [Post reply via Twitter?](https://meta.discourse.org/t/post-reply-via-twitter/20332)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@Ricardo\_Viteri](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Ricardo_Viteri)\
**댓글:** 3\
**마지막 업데이트:** [9월 24, 2014, 10:12오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/post-reply-via-twitter/20332 "2014-09-24T22:12:36Z")

</div>

Would it be possible for users to post a short reply via Twitter to a forum discussion?

---

## [GPG signed emails](https://meta.discourse.org/t/gpg-signed-emails/20390)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@funvill](https://meta.discourse.org/u/funvill)\
**댓글:** 2\
**마지막 업데이트:** [9월 24, 2014, 3:37오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/gpg-signed-emails/20390 "2014-09-24T15:37:36Z")

</div>

My overly security conscious group is looking for the emails that are sent from discourse to be GPG signed by discourse. Not encrypted emails but signed. Over half of our group primarily interacts with discourse via emai…

---

## [Downloading backups should include Content Length](https://meta.discourse.org/t/downloading-backups-should-include-content-length/20175)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@DeanMarkTaylor](https://meta.discourse.org/u/DeanMarkTaylor)\
**댓글:** 4\
**마지막 업데이트:** [9월 22, 2014, 11:27오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/downloading-backups-should-include-content-length/20175 "2014-09-22T23:27:31Z")

</div>

When downloading backups from the admin page the browser is unable to display a progress bar due to Content Length header not being included. When backups get large it is difficult to know how far though the download…

---

## [Typo in prepended text for invited users in welcome message, not editable](https://meta.discourse.org/t/typo-in-prepended-text-for-invited-users-in-welcome-message-not-editable/20210)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@tobiaseigen](https://meta.discourse.org/u/tobiaseigen)\
**댓글:** 2\
**마지막 업데이트:** [9월 22, 2014, 6:41오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/typo-in-prepended-text-for-invited-users-in-welcome-message-not-editable/20210 "2014-09-22T18:41:08Z")

</div>

The welcome message gets some prepended text if the new user came to the forum by way of an invitation. There’s a minor typo in there - see screenshot. But the real issue for me is that this template text is not editable…

---

## [API Functionality for invites](https://meta.discourse.org/t/api-functionality-for-invites/20278)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@alxnik](https://meta.discourse.org/u/alxnik)\
**댓글:** 5\
**마지막 업데이트:** [9월 22, 2014, 6:05오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/api-functionality-for-invites/20278 "2014-09-22T18:05:23Z")

</div>

I have deployed a discourse installation which is invite only and I am looking for a way to trigger invitations from another website. However, I don’t want to invite users to a specific topic, but to the forum in general…

---

## [Archive Topics via Bulk](https://meta.discourse.org/t/archive-topics-via-bulk/20302)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@cpradio](https://meta.discourse.org/u/cpradio)\
**댓글:** 3\
**마지막 업데이트:** [6월 19, 2015, 12:38오전 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/archive-topics-via-bulk/20302 "2015-06-19T00:38:19Z")

</div>

I noticed that the Bulk actions permit the following: Would supplying a change that permitted Archive Topics (next to Close Topics) be accepted?

---

## [Ability to not bump topics](https://meta.discourse.org/t/ability-to-not-bump-topics/20286)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@Qwertie\_](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Qwertie_)\
**댓글:** 4\
**마지막 업데이트:** [9월 21, 2014, 3:36오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/ability-to-not-bump-topics/20286 "2014-09-21T15:36:43Z")

</div>

One common problem with forums is you can’t reply to really old topics because you will bump it to the top of the forum which annoys other users of the forum because they don’t want to see old topics again. But sometimes…

---

## [Topic search doesn't search for user names](https://meta.discourse.org/t/topic-search-doesnt-search-for-user-names/20171)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@heinrich5991](https://meta.discourse.org/u/heinrich5991)\
**댓글:** 15\
**마지막 업데이트:** [9월 20, 2014, 12:36오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/topic-search-doesnt-search-for-user-names/20171 "2014-09-20T12:36:42Z")

</div>

Basically the issue the title describes. When I press CTRL+F and search for a user that posted in a specific thread, I only find the people quoting them. This is unexpected, because with the browser search I’d expect to…

---

## [Move to existing topic should show category](https://meta.discourse.org/t/move-to-existing-topic-should-show-category/20128)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@downey](https://meta.discourse.org/u/downey)\
**댓글:** 3\
**마지막 업데이트:** [9월 19, 2014, 3:42오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/move-to-existing-topic-should-show-category/20128 "2014-09-19T15:42:57Z")

</div>

As an admin (or moderator?) I want to be able to see the categories of posts when searching for a topic for which to move a post/reply, so I can more clearly identify the actual “correct” topic. The current UI allows se…

---

## [Include reading time in the site stats](https://meta.discourse.org/t/include-reading-time-in-the-site-stats/20108)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@probus](https://meta.discourse.org/u/probus)\
**댓글:** 4\
**마지막 업데이트:** [9월 18, 2014, 3:30오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/include-reading-time-in-the-site-stats/20108 "2014-09-18T15:30:24Z")

</div>

I believe we should add another metric into the admin dashboard. What I’m specifically thinking is: The time spent reading forum posts I know Discourse already tracks reading time so it should be possible to show an ag…

---

## [Include anonymous users in site stats](https://meta.discourse.org/t/include-anonymous-users-in-site-stats/20109)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@probus](https://meta.discourse.org/u/probus)\
**댓글:** 2\
**마지막 업데이트:** [9월 18, 2014, 8:00오전 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/include-anonymous-users-in-site-stats/20109 "2014-09-18T08:00:20Z")

</div>

The site stats in admin panel could do with a redesign. By providing a just a few key metrics there we could reduce the need to use google analytics etc. for many forum owners and provide them with better data to underst…

---

## [Stacked FontAwesome icons for badges, etc](https://meta.discourse.org/t/stacked-fontawesome-icons-for-badges-etc/20071)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@fysics](https://meta.discourse.org/u/fysics)\
**댓글:** 6\
**마지막 업데이트:** [9월 16, 2014, 4:23오전 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/stacked-fontawesome-icons-for-badges-etc/20071 "2014-09-16T04:23:05Z")

</div>

Stacking FontAwesome icons can result in some pretty neat looking glyphs. It would be nice to be able to stack icons like this when specifying the icon for a badge. It involves a parent element with fa-stack class, then…

[이전 페이지](https://meta.discourse.org/c/contribute/feature/2.md?page=258&state=muted)

[다음 페이지](https://meta.discourse.org/c/contribute/feature/2.md?page=260&state=muted)
