Kind of a small issue, but I just noticed that the post number on the post doesn’t agree with the post number on the right side scroll slider. In the example below, I’m looking at the last post in the thread. The disagreement appears to be due to hidden posts, but shows this way for regular users. Should one or the other be adjusted to take hidden posts into account that regular users have no idea even exist? [ScreenShot]

This is actually correct. One is the absolute post number, the other is the relative post count in the live topic.

Maybe I’m not being clear. It doesn’t make sense (to the average user) that there are a total of 64 posts in the thread, but the one they’re looking at is #68. We know it’s because there are hidden posts. But because they have no clue about the hidden posts, it is confusing them.

Right, but like user ID numbers, or topic ID numbers, it is what it is – a unique numeric identifier for each post.

At SitePoint we do it mainly for different reasons, but it is easy to display the post id number near posts: [image] Show post numbers Feature It is hard to say if this is what you are looking for, but it should get you close. We use that CSS to put #1, #2, et al on a topic after the date/timestamp.

Okay, I understand the post # is not just a reference, it is used as the ID for the post. Therefore, the hidden posts need to keep their numbers in the sequence. If we can consider it a just a display issue, I can think of two ways to fix it: For display purpose only, adjust the “post#nn” displayed in the popup box by subtracting the number of hidden posts above it, eg: [image] I understand that the displayed post number would disagree with the coded URL in the box. Include hidden posts in the relative post number and total (eg. 64/64) even when they are not expanded (admins/mods) or even visible (regular users). In my example, the last post would then show 68/68 on the slider. I understand that the incrementing number in the slider would “jump” as it passes hidden posts. This would expose to the clever user that there are posts hiding. But they can already tell that if they click each post’s timestamp in succession. All that said, I understand that both of these might be difficult to implement in the CSS. Given that only one of our users has noticed this, if it’s difficult to change, it’s not a high priority for me personally.

[image] Loki: , it’s not a high priority for me personally. I suspect that you are good company.

[image] Loki: post # is not just a reference, it is used as the ID for the post. It is not used as the post id, it is the post id. The numbers in the timeline scroller are “nth visible post numbers”, not post id numbers

[image] Mittineague: The numbers in the timeline scroller are “nth visible post numbers”, not post id numbers Okay, then my solution #2 could be restated: “In the timeline scroller, display the Nth post number, including invisible posts in N.”

Post number on slider disagrees with post

Product Support

codinghorror (Jeff Atwood) July 20, 2019, 9:03pm 12

This will not be happening.

Topic		Replies	Views
Post numbering inconsistent with scrollbar Feature	1	807	November 4, 2016
Whispered replies leak in the post number Product Support whispers	29	2175	January 26, 2021
Post URLs different from Post numbers Product Support	6	663	August 15, 2020
Show post numbers Feature	10	1513	January 23, 2025
Posts count and highest post number Product Support	3	570	August 10, 2020

Post number on slider disagrees with post

Related topics