Thank you for taking the time to read this and ask meaningful questions.
Yes!
At present no.
However if you have access to an attorney in/for the company then asking them about this might be of benefit. This is one of those things that governments are looking at creating laws and while I am not an attorney bringing a plan to the government before they make the laws is better than having the law created and having to abide by it.
Yes, many researchers believed citations were real until they could not find them. I don’t collect such but can keep an eye out for them and note them if you would like.
AI Generated Photograph wins award!
I get where you are going but that is not the question I would be asking. Perhaps these instead.
Are people aware that AI is now creating human like text that sounds correct and is not?
Are people aware that AI is creating images that people are convinced it was created by another human? or even appears to be taken by a camera but is instead AI generated?
Would people such as researchers, teachers and other with a vested interest in factual information like to know that hallucinations are tagged as such with meta data? or came from a source known to generate hallucinations?
A bigger problem is others that will take advantage of these people who do not know about such. If the data is marked as an hallucination and the data is cleaned of the meta tag then I would not be surprised if a lawyer can use that to show intent.
Again, thank you for your interest. At present I don’t plan to push this further as you seem to have the idea but if you have other questions, I don’t mind answering. Personally I would rather live in a world where we did not need spam filters, virus scanners and now it seems hallucinations checks because people want to misuse the technology. 