On that note, it would be far more approachable to describe the data by what it is, rather than enmeshing an argument about computer-generated text, especially when discussing it with an audience who may not have the background information.
Embedding your own bias (whether true or not) into the question is somewhat disingenuous.
For example:
It would be convenient to have a standard way to delineate text written by a generative language model (Computer AI).
We already have some methods, e.g.: @discobot roll 4d6
In the absence of an explicit author, proper citation is probably the best approach.