Nous recevons une vague d’erreurs similaire toutes les quelques heures :
2025/05/19 16:48:10 [error] 63#63: *1738520 open() "/var/www/discourse/public/assets/workbox-77b0e3e0dd4773bcd6c7e74f302f7c69/workbox-core.prod.js" failed (2: No such file or directory), client: unix:, server: _, request: "GET /forum/assets/workbox-77b0e3e0dd4773bcd6c7e74f302f7c69/workbox-core.prod.js HTTP/1.1", host: "XXXX"
2025/05/19 16:48:10 [error] 63#63: *1738520 open() "/var/www/discourse/public/assets/workbox-77b0e3e0dd4773bcd6c7e74f302f7c69/workbox-routing.prod.js" failed (2: No such file or directory), client: unix:, server: _, request: "GET /forum/assets/workbox-77b0e3e0dd4773bcd6c7e74f302f7c69/workbox-routing.prod.js HTTP/1.1", host: "XXXX"
2025/05/19 16:48:10 [error] 63#63: *1738520 open() "/var/www/discourse/public/assets/workbox-77b0e3e0dd4773bcd6c7e74f302f7c69/workbox-expiration.prod.js" failed (2: No such file or directory), client: unix:, server: _, request: "GET /forum/assets/workbox-77b0e3e0dd4773bcd6c7e74f302f7c69/workbox-expiration.prod.js HTTP/1.1", host: "XXXX"
2025/05/19 16:48:10 [error] 63#63: *1738520 open() "/var/www/discourse/public/assets/workbox-77b0e3e0dd4773bcd6c7e74f302f7c69/workbox-sw.js" failed (2: No such file or directory), client: unix:, server: _, request: "GET /forum/assets/workbox-77b0e3e0dd4773bcd6c7e74f302f7c69/workbox-sw.js HTTP/1.1", host: "XXXX"
2025/05/19 16:48:10 [error] 63#63: *1738520 open() "/var/www/discourse/public/assets/workbox-77b0e3e0dd4773bcd6c7e74f302f7c69/workbox-cacheable-response.prod.js" failed (2: No such file or directory), client: unix:, server: _, request: "GET /forum/assets/workbox-77b0e3e0dd4773bcd6c7e74f302f7c69/workbox-cacheable-response.prod.js HTTP/1.1", host: "XXXX"
2025/05/19 16:48:10 [error] 63#63: *1738520 open() "/var/www/discourse/public/assets/workbox-77b0e3e0dd4773bcd6c7e74f302f7c69/workbox-strategies.prod.js" failed (2: No such file or directory), client: unix:, server: _, request: "GET /forum/assets/workbox-77b0e3e0dd4773bcd6c7e74f302f7c69/workbox-strategies.prod.js HTTP/1.1", host: "XXXX"
Dans ce cas, c’est avec public/assets, mais nous avons aussi des entrées de journal pour public/javascript :
2025/05/12 18:00:39 [error] 78023#78023: *701261 open() "/var/www/discourse/public/javascripts/workbox/workbox-sw.js" failed (2: No such file or directory), client: unix:, server: _, request: "GET /forum/javascripts/workbox/workbox-sw.js HTTP/1.1", host: "XXXX"
2025/05/12 18:00:39 [error] 78023#78023: *701261 open() "/var/www/discourse/public/javascripts/workbox/workbox-routing.prod.js" failed (2: No such file or directory), client: unix:, server: _, request: "GET /forum/javascripts/workbox/workbox-routing.prod.js HTTP/1.1", host: "XXXX"
2025/05/12 18:00:39 [error] 78023#78023: *701261 open() "/var/www/discourse/public/javascripts/workbox/workbox-cacheable-response.prod.js" failed (2: No such file or directory), client: unix:, server: _, request: "GET /forum/javascripts/workbox/workbox-cacheable-response.prod.js HTTP/1.1", host: "XXXX"
2025/05/12 18:00:39 [error] 78023#78023: *701261 open() "/var/www/discourse/public/javascripts/workbox/workbox-strategies.prod.js" failed (2: No such file or directory), client: unix:, server: _, request: "GET /forum/javascripts/workbox/workbox-strategies.prod.js HTTP/1.1", host: "XXXX"
2025/05/12 18:00:39 [error] 78023#78023: *701261 open() "/var/www/discourse/public/javascripts/workbox/workbox-core.prod.js" failed (2: No such file or directory), client: unix:, server: _, request: "GET /forum/javascripts/workbox/workbox-core.prod.js HTTP/1.1", host: "XXXX"
2025/05/12 18:00:39 [error] 78023#78023: *701261 open() "/var/www/discourse/public/javascripts/workbox/workbox-expiration.prod.js" failed (2: No such file or directory), client: unix:, server: _, request: "GET /forum/javascripts/workbox/workbox-expiration.prod.js HTTP/1.
Le chemin a-t-il changé avec une version ? C’est probablement lorsque le cache du navigateur n’est pas correctement vidé, respectivement que l’actif n’est pas invalidé. Ou, plus probablement, ce sont des bots stupides qui continuent de scanner les ressources qu’ils ont trouvées une fois. Je veux dire que nous avons des milliers de visiteurs et des douzaines de contributeurs entre deux ensembles de journaux, donc cela ne semble pas être un problème général.
Dans notre cas, l’accès se fait via un proxy à l’extérieur du conteneur et un socket UNIX, donc pas d’adresses IP clientes visibles pour vérifier. Pour 77.208.167.253, je n’ai pas pu trouver d’informations pertinentes, qu’il s’agisse d’un bot ou non.