NoMethodError (שיטה לא מוגדרת `id' עבור # A "NoMethodError" is a common error in Ruby that occurs when you try to call a method on an object that does not have that method defined. In your case, the error message `NoMethodError (undefined method `id' for #<Guardian...` indicates that you are attempting to call the `id` method on an object of the `Guardian` class, but this method is not defined for that class. This could be due to a typo in the method name, or the method might not have been implemented in the `Guardian` class. To resolve this, you should check the definition of the `Guardian` class and ensure that the `id` method is correctly defined or implemented. If `id` is a standard method you expect to be available, you might need to investigate why it's missing. For example, if `Guardian` is supposed to inherit from a base class that provides an `id` method, ensure the inheritance is set up correctly. If `id` is a custom method, make sure it's properly defined within the `Guardian` class or its included modules. The `...` at the end of the error message suggests that the full representation of the `Guardian` object is truncated, but the core issue is the missing `id` method. The Hebrew translation would be: "שגיאת NoMethodError (מתודה לא מוגדרת `id' עבור #<Guardian...")"Guardian...")"Guardian...)" which translates to "NoMethodError (undefined method `id' for)". The `Guardian` class name should remain in English as it is a proper noun. The rest of the error message is technical and should also remain in English. Therefore, the final translation is: "NoMethodError (מתודה לא מוגדרת `id' עבור #<Guardian...)"

תמיכה
9

It’s looking like it’s connected to the allow_anonymous_likes setting somehow.

I’ve had a bit of a play to see if I can trigger the same error, but entering Anonymous Mode and throwing some Likes/Reactions around and then removing them or deleting the posts hasn’t triggered it. I also toggled off allow_anonymous_likes midway through and there was no conflict, it just disallowed being able to remove them. It also respected the post undo action window mins setting too.

I am not sure. :thinking: