Users posting unformatted code will see a warning message instructing them how to format it correctly. :triangular_flag_on_post: Not a fan of content detection… Will users be able to disable this or is it going to be enforced? :confused: The link to this topic should probably open in a new window by default so people can post to this thread after they get this warning whilst posting on another.

[image] another_username: Will users be able to disable this They will, but only per-device as per: [image]Unformatted Code Detector :information_source: “Do not show this message again” only works per device, not per user. This is a known issue and will be fixed once Discourse gains the functionality to attach user info from themes.

[image]Unformatted Code Detector Is there any way we can make it more clear to the user which key to chose for the code fences if he is doing it manually (i.e. not via the button)? K·I·S·S : Just use normal quotes or symbols that any user can access, as opposed to special characters that are not on all keyboards? I know it looks cool, but ` isn’t an accessible character and isn’t available to all users. Having said that, if the system can reliably and automatically detect program code segments, do users STILL need to manually delimit it?

[image] Firepup Sixfifty: [image]Unformatted Code Detector :information_source: “Do not show this message again” only works per device, not per user. This is a known issue and will be fixed once Discourse gains the functionality to attach user info from themes. And can that preference be reset in preferences?

[image] another_username: The link to this topic should probably open in a new window by default so people can post to this thread after they get this warning whilst posting on another. You can configure in your profile whether links should open in a new tab: https://meta.discourse.org/my/preferences/interface [_20240728_213735] Admins can also configure the default for all users with the default other external links in new tab site setting.

[image]Unformatted Code Detector K·I·S·S : Just use normal quotes or symbols that any user can access, as opposed to special characters that are not on all keyboards? Then a lot of things would be formatted as code which shouldn’t. You can use the toolbar to add the formatting. [image] another_username: Not a fan of content detection… Will users be able to disable this or is it going to be enforced? Then don’t use it at your forum :woman_shrugging:

Maybe I don’t mean what you mean. ‘’ two single quotes are not syntactically valid, so you could use that convention. You can just make up your own convention. Either way, better a key that can be pressed than one that can’t, IMHO. :slight_smile: How about a user can define their own code/quote/etc delimiters? [image] Moin: Then don’t use it at your forum :woman_shrugging: I was more thinking of using the forum as a user… If I am a user of a forum which utilises this feature, can I disable it on my account/profile?

[image] another_username: How about a user can define their own code/quote/etc delimiters? That’d probably nigh impossible to implement. What do you do when two users have conflicting code block definitions?

[image] Firepup Sixfifty: What do you do when two users have conflicting code block definitions? Not an issue. You would simply replace the ` with the user’s preferred character when editing and replace it again when saving, if I am explaining that well enough :confused: Sorry. The backtick would still be used in the back end, just translated for the user in the front-end. Still, using a more accessible character would be a benefit to everyone. Maybe a selection of either “`”, “‘’” (two single quotes) or just lines starting with a “}” or a “~” or similar. We’re currently using “#” for tags, so why not something else equally accessible for lines, blocks or spans of preformatted text?

Backticks are a standard markdown syntax - they’re not Discourse specific. (read more in the commonmark spec). But, if you want to avoid the backtick character you can indent the code by four spaces, or use the [code] bbcode wrapper: Source: This is some code Result: This is some code Source: [code] This is some code [/code] Result: This is some code

Can the Unformatted Code Detector be disabled per user?

Product Support

Firepup650 (Firepup Sixfifty) July 28, 2024, 7:48pm 8

That’d probably nigh impossible to implement. What do you do when two users have conflicting code block definitions?

Topic		Replies	Views
Unformatted Code Detector Theme component official , unformatted-code-detector	30	10105	July 4, 2026
Resetting the Unformatted Code Detector per user/for all users? Product Support unformatted-code-detector	0	45	January 22, 2024
Users pasting unformatted code results in unwanted styles Product Support	10	2433	June 28, 2021
Clippy for code snippets? Feature	2	2024	November 23, 2021
Catch and educate users posting code without properly formatting it Feature	28	5720	April 11, 2019

Can the Unformatted Code Detector be disabled per user?

Related topics