Thanks for pointing this out — you’re absolutely right.
The naming is historical and comes from Discourse’s default emoji
structure, but the actual animated assets are from Google Noto Emoji,
not Twemoji. I agree this is confusing and needs to be clarified.
I’m currently:
- Updating the attribution to fully comply with the Noto Emoji license
- Clarifying the asset source in the README
- Reviewing naming / folder structure to reduce confusion
Thanks for the review and for catching this.