Hello, switched storage driver to devicemapper (direct-lvm) and Discourse refuses to rebuild, why devicemapper option is filtered since it is one of the proper production setups. Do not confuse with loop-lvm, where loop devices are created in filesystem, they have terrible performance. The direct-lvm uses hard drive directly, without interaction with host filesystem. More info here Device Mapper storage driver (deprecated) | Docker Docs In general, most suitable options for storage should be overlay2, devicemapper (direct-lvm mode) and btrfs. The first one is default one, good performance, reliable. The devicemapper and btrfs gives ability to snapshot the data, easier to manage backups. Also devicemapper is good for write heavy operations, btrfs has superior performance but not all systems support it. Simple fix for now to allow devicemapper, can I open PR ? diff --git a/launcher b/launcher index 9d44cda..ec2964a 100755 --- a/launcher +++ b/launcher @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ check_prereqs() { fi # 2. running an approved storage driver? - if ! $docker_path info 2> /dev/null | egrep -q '^Storage Driver: (aufs|btrfs|zfs|overlay|overlay2)$'; then + if ! $docker_path info 2> /dev/null | egrep -q '^Storage Driver: (aufs|btrfs|zfs|overlay|overlay2|devicemapper)$'; then echo "Your Docker installation is not using a supported storage driver. If we were to proceed you may have a broken install." echo "aufs is the recommended storage driver, although zfs/btrfs/overlay and overlay2 may work as well." echo "Other storage drivers are known to be problematic."

No, because we don’t support devicemapper based on the large number of problems we’ve had with it in the past. If you’d like to skip that step for your install, you are welcome to do so of course.

Even issues with direct-lvm ? Can mention those issues ?

We had lots of issues with the standard out of the box devicemapper, so we block it by default. If you did your homework and is sure that your storage driver is up to the task, just add --skip-prereqs to the launcher command line.

Please report back here in say 2-3 months after say 5-10 rebuilds, I am very curious to see if this holds for you. Also be sure to post your exact version of Docker and Kernel with explanation on how you set up DM just-so.

Sure, will keep you updated. One moment I already found, by using software RAID 1 (mdadm) on plain sata disks with lvm gives performance degradation, uses a lot of cpu time for syncing. On 8 core system load average was 2-4, after the switch to btrfs on same RAID1, reduced the load to 1-2. But I keep testing the direct-lvm, might find the bottleneck

Docker storage drivers

Product Support Self-hosting

Danpiel (Danpiel) June 3, 2018, 8:03am 5

Thanks a lot for override flag, no pain for updating and backporting changes.

Topic		Replies	Views
What is the best docker storage backend to use on a VPS? Self-hosting docker	9	5597	November 29, 2016
Upgrade and rebuild reporting I need to use Aufs instead of Devicemapper (on CentOS) Product Support	24	3278	June 19, 2019
How to switch from Docker devicemapper to something less problematic Product Support	4	1460	August 2, 2018
Change the Docker storage backend Sysadmins docker , how-to	4	23143	October 22, 2024
Docker is not using a supported storage driver Self-hosting	5	1296	July 8, 2019

Docker storage drivers

Related topics