# 0 second post wait?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/0-second-post-wait/89929>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [June 14, 2018, 11:49pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/0-second-post-wait/89929 "2018-06-14T23:49:59Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![neil](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/neil/32/102150_2.png) [@neil](https://meta.discourse.org/u/neil)\
**Post date:** [June 15, 2018, 9:32pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/0-second-post-wait/89929/6 "2018-06-15T21:32:26Z")

</div>

Ok, [it’s here](https://github.com/discourse/discourse/blob/master/lib/rate_limiter/limit_exceeded.rb#L14-L15):

```plaintext
if @available_in < 1.minute.to_i
        time_left = I18n.t("rate_limiter.seconds", count: @available_in)

```

Is “wait less then a second” any better than “wait 0 seconds” though? It’s still silly… Maybe “wait a few seconds”?

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/0-second-post-wait/89929)._