# A new review queue layout with all new features

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/a-new-review-queue-layout-with-all-new-features/388194
**Category:** Announcements
**Tags:** review-queue
**Created:** [November 13, 2025, 2:45am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/a-new-review-queue-layout-with-all-new-features/388194 "2025-11-13T02:45:44Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 46

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![pangbo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/pangbo/32/538562_2.png) [@pangbo](https://meta.discourse.org/u/pangbo)
#### Post date: [December 28, 2025, 8:39am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/a-new-review-queue-layout-with-all-new-features/388194/46 "2025-12-28T08:39:02Z")

</div>

Currently, the `registerReviewableActionModal` interface in the frontend plugin API only registers modals to the old review queue layout:

> <https://github.com/discourse/discourse/blob/dd655f15d219fcc821db48caf613017f69dcad66/frontend/discourse/app/lib/plugin-api.gjs#L25-L28>

However, the new layout fully supports this feature.

> <https://github.com/discourse/discourse/blob/dd655f15d219fcc821db48caf613017f69dcad66/frontend/discourse/app/components/reviewable-refresh/item.gjs#L62-L69>

I am curious as to whether this was an intentional design choice, or simply an oversight?

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/a-new-review-queue-layout-with-all-new-features/388194)._
