# Habilidade de bloquear o acesso ao Discourse de regiões geográficas ou países

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/ability-to-block-discourse-access-from-geographic-regions-or-countries/115112>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [Abril 15, 2019, 2:37pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/ability-to-block-discourse-access-from-geographic-regions-or-countries/115112 "2019-04-15T14:37:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 15

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![terraboss](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/terraboss/32/579307_2.png) [@terraboss](https://meta.discourse.org/u/terraboss)\
**Post date:** [Abril 20, 2019, 10:40am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/ability-to-block-discourse-access-from-geographic-regions-or-countries/115112/15 "2019-04-20T10:40:03Z")

</div>

Does someone really believe, that blocking will solve anything?

It’s a regulatory / compliance question, that will be addressed sooner or later by legislation due international free trade and copyright agreements.

In my opinion, we need to talk about risk management and watch dog processes instead of [over-blocking](https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overblocking) and the [chilling effects](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chilling_effect).

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/ability-to-block-discourse-access-from-geographic-regions-or-countries/115112)._
