# Ability to discuss on top of a flag?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/ability-to-discuss-on-top-of-a-flag/42964>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [2016 年 4 月 22 日午前 2:21 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/ability-to-discuss-on-top-of-a-flag/42964 "2016-04-22T02:21:06Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![trandatnh](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/trandatnh/32/115055_2.png) [@trandatnh](https://meta.discourse.org/u/trandatnh)\
**Post date:** [2016 年 4 月 22 日午前 2:53 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/ability-to-discuss-on-top-of-a-flag/42964/3 "2016-04-22T02:53:37Z")

</div>

> [@sam](#):
>
> Is actually quite rare.

It’s not true in my case, I feel like half of the flags are wrong. Most of of the posts flagged as spam are actually inappropriate/off-topic posts.

Since spam flags are treated very seriously by Discourse, I can’t agree with those flags but have to defer or disagree it. It leads to another problem, my members will find that I actually don’t care of their flags but I can’t tell them why I disagree or defer it in an easy way.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/ability-to-discuss-on-top-of-a-flag/42964)._