# Ability to unroll context when in-reply-to indicator is suppressed?

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/ability-to-unroll-context-when-in-reply-to-indicator-is-suppressed/18166
**Category:** Feature
**Created:** [28 ביולי,‏ 2014,‏ 1:54pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/ability-to-unroll-context-when-in-reply-to-indicator-is-suppressed/18166 "2014-07-28T13:54:27Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 13

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![sam](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/sam/32/102149_2.png) [@sam](https://meta.discourse.org/u/sam)
#### Post date: [30 ביולי,‏ 2014,‏ 1:06am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/ability-to-unroll-context-when-in-reply-to-indicator-is-suppressed/18166/13 "2014-07-30T01:06:34Z")

</div>

I added a setting and re-framed the conversation into something more manageable.

> [@Is suppress reply when quoting too atomic?](https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-suppress-reply-when-quoting-too-atomic/18249):
>
> I just added a site setting called “suppress reply when quoting” [https://github.com/discourse/discourse/commit/87dd6814972a1c44846a8ab1a1743be010525110](https://github.com/discourse/discourse/commit/87dd6814972a1c44846a8ab1a1743be010525110) The description for it is: “Don’t show the expandable in-reply-to on a post when post contains any quotes.” I personally think our suppression here is a bit too atomic. I think a much safer default is "“Don’t show the expandable in-reply-to on a post when post quotes the post replied to”. As it stands, the default, throws away information fr…

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/ability-to-unroll-context-when-in-reply-to-indicator-is-suppressed/18166)._