# נגישות ושפה מתנשאת ואופמיזמים

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/accessibility-and-patronizing-language-and-euphemisms/281591>\
**Category:** UX\
**Created:** [9 באוקטובר,‏ 2023,‏ 7:15am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/accessibility-and-patronizing-language-and-euphemisms/281591 "2023-10-09T07:15:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![speeps](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/8baadc/32.png) [@speeps](https://meta.discourse.org/u/speeps)\
**Post date:** [9 באוקטובר,‏ 2023,‏ 7:15am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/accessibility-and-patronizing-language-and-euphemisms/281591/1 "2023-10-09T07:15:19Z")

</div>

When JS is off, you get:

“Works best with Javascript”

Yet it obviously does not work without JS at all.

The german translation does that even more patronizing.

 ![Screenshot_20231009-090337](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/4X/4/d/f/4dfb2d8bdd648c83053307d250efb47b8da6bf7d.png)

Also please make content viewable without JS.

This is a real accessibility problem for me.

I deactivate JS by default because websites are so full of clutter, things jumping around and visual noise that I can’t bear this at all without having apparently unusually high amounts of mental pain.

(  
Another note, I was just told that new users couldn’t add more than 1 file.  
That came after pressing send.  
How about telling before sending?  
)

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/accessibility-and-patronizing-language-and-euphemisms/281591)._