# נגישות ושפה מתנשאת ואופמיזמים

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/accessibility-and-patronizing-language-and-euphemisms/281591>\
**Category:** UX\
**Created:** [9 באוקטובר,‏ 2023,‏ 7:15am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/accessibility-and-patronizing-language-and-euphemisms/281591 "2023-10-09T07:15:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ed\_S](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/ed_s/32/134015_2.png) [@Ed\_S](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Ed_S)\
**Post date:** [10 באוקטובר,‏ 2023,‏ 5:11pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/accessibility-and-patronizing-language-and-euphemisms/281591/9 "2023-10-10T17:11:36Z")

</div>

> [@Falco](#):
>
> preposterous

Maybe, maybe not. But more generally, making design decisions based on an impact to only a small proportion of users seems potentially problematic to me. Support for older browsers, and for unusual ways of accessing the web, would fall inside that concern. I don’t know a lot about accessibility tactics - but I would hope someone does, inside the decision-making team for Discourse.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/accessibility-and-patronizing-language-and-euphemisms/281591)._