# Accessibility audit and shepherd for making improvements

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/accessibility-audit-and-shepherd-for-making-improvements/66620
**Category:** UX
**Tags:** accessibility
**Created:** [21.Июль.2017 22:17:25 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/accessibility-audit-and-shepherd-for-making-improvements/66620 "2017-07-21T22:17:25Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![codinghorror](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/codinghorror/32/110067_2.png) [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)
#### Post date: [21.Июль.2017 22:50:12 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/accessibility-audit-and-shepherd-for-making-improvements/66620/3 "2017-07-21T22:50:12Z")

</div>

Just to add: everything here sounds great with one minor exception.

I would say I am quite opposed to changing `<b>` to `<strong>` since I feel that’s a trivial, noisy change that has no real meaning and massive downside in terms of payload size and breaking changes to CSS rules; these tags are synonyms and `<strong>` is way too verbose. But the rest sounds amazing!

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/accessibility-audit-and-shepherd-for-making-improvements/66620)._