# 在 Akismet 中添加选项，显示同意“标记为垃圾邮件”的工作人员成员

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/add-option-to-akismet-to-show-staff-members-who-agreed-with-mark-as-spam/97290>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Tags:** akismet\
**Created:** [2018 年9 月 16 日 16:50 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/add-option-to-akismet-to-show-staff-members-who-agreed-with-mark-as-spam/97290 "2018-09-16T16:50:04Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

作者： ![sam](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/sam/32/102149_2.png) [@sam](https://meta.discourse.org/u/sam)\
发布日期： [2018 年9 月 16 日 23:40 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/add-option-to-akismet-to-show-staff-members-who-agreed-with-mark-as-spam/97290/2 "2018-09-16T23:40:32Z")

</div>

We have a long term todo here for normalizing “flags” / “akismet” and “queued posts” into 1 review section. At that point I think we can investigate giving you more fidelity here.

At the moment it is not easy at all to see a quick report of what actions staff took against the akismet queue. I think at a minimum we should log a staff action when marking something as spam / not spam. @eviltrout I know this was a long time ago but do you recall if any auditing was built into akismet short of custom fields?

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/add-option-to-akismet-to-show-staff-members-who-agreed-with-mark-as-spam/97290)._