# Add the ability to filter by ‘Claimed by’
**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/add-the-ability-to-filter-by-claimed-by/370128
**Category:** Feature
**Tags:** moderation, review-queue
**Created:** [June 13, 2025, 8:12pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/add-the-ability-to-filter-by-claimed-by/370128 "2025-06-13T20:12:03Z")
**Posts on this page:** 4
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@T\_Disco](https://meta.discourse.org/u/T_Disco)
#### Post date: [June 13, 2025, 8:12pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/add-the-ability-to-filter-by-claimed-by/370128/1 "2025-06-13T20:12:03Z")
On the review queue page it would be useful to have the ability to filter by ‘Claimed by’.
---
### Author:  [@hugh](https://meta.discourse.org/u/hugh)
#### Post date: [November 17, 2025, 2:08am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/add-the-ability-to-filter-by-claimed-by/370128/2 "2025-11-17T02:08:45Z")
We currently have a filter for “Assigned to”, which does what you’re asking for here. It should be reworded though, since we use ‘Claim’ instead of ‘Assign’ in the reviewable itself - we’ll get that fixed up.
---
### Author:  [@T\_Disco](https://meta.discourse.org/u/T_Disco)
#### Post date: [November 21, 2025, 12:17pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/add-the-ability-to-filter-by-claimed-by/370128/3 "2025-11-21T12:17:34Z")
Is there a way of returning all claimed reviewables (as in a wildcard \* type search - not filtering by individual users) using the ‘Assigned to’ (soon to be ‘Claimed by’) filter?
---
### Author:  [@hugh](https://meta.discourse.org/u/hugh)
#### Post date: [November 24, 2025, 11:55pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/add-the-ability-to-filter-by-claimed-by/370128/4 "2025-11-24T23:55:06Z")
We have added a ‘Claimed by’ filter to the review queue now - this has been merged and will be available once your site has been updated.
We also made some other improvements to clarify the names of some of the filters.
> [@T\_Disco](#):
>
> Is there a way of returning all claimed reviewables (as in a wildcard \* type search - not filtering by individual users)
We didn’t implement something like this, but it’s certainly an interesting idea. I’ll add that to the backlog as an improvement we can work on when we get to it.