# Adding multiple users to group is kludgy

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/adding-multiple-users-to-group-is-kludgy/396063>\
**Category:** UX\
**Tags:** groups, users\
**Created:** [February 13, 2026, 6:51pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/adding-multiple-users-to-group-is-kludgy/396063 "2026-02-13T18:51:15Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![chapoi](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/chapoi/32/537252_2.png) [@chapoi](https://meta.discourse.org/u/chapoi)\
**Post date:** [February 13, 2026, 7:26pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/adding-multiple-users-to-group-is-kludgy/396063/4 "2026-02-13T19:26:03Z")

</div>

> [@stephtara](#):
>
> Maybe a first step would be a scrollable list of all users not in group instead of nothing?

Maybe, but I’m not sure it would help much. Great for a small forum of \<50 people, but imagine you have 1000s of users… Scrollable list won’t help much (and not sure if technically even feasible).

I think I like your other idea of somehow adding more actions from the user list better. However, that of course would be a much bigger change than UX.

Either way, I agree it could use some TLC.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/adding-multiple-users-to-group-is-kludgy/396063)._