# AI Summarization doesn't properly format links

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/ai-summarization-doesnt-properly-format-links/277695>\
**Category:** Bug\
**Tags:** ai, ai-summarize\
**Created:** [September 4, 2023, 10:30am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/ai-summarization-doesnt-properly-format-links/277695 "2023-09-04T10:30:01Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Canapin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/canapin/32/119591_2.png) [@Canapin](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Canapin)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2023, 10:30am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/ai-summarization-doesnt-properly-format-links/277695/1 "2023-09-04T10:30:01Z")

</div>

I summarized this:

> [@What version of Font Awesome does Category Icons use?](https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-version-of-font-awesome-does-category-icons-use/277694):
>
> that would be nice. What version of FontAwesome is it using now?

The result:

> This discussion is about which version of Font Awesome the Category Icons plugin for Discourse uses.
> 
> TechnoFox ([1][/t/-/277694]) asked what version Category Icons uses, wondering if an upgrade is possible. Firepup650 ([2][/t/-/277694]) responded that Discourse overall uses FontAwesome 5, so upgrading Category Icons alone would require changes to other parts of Discourse.
> 
> TechnoFox ([3][/t/-/277694]) followed up by asking if there are any plans to update Discourse to newer FontAwesome versions, and what might be preventing that.
> 
> Finally, pfaffman ([4][/t/-/277694]) linked to a meta post indicating Discourse has introduced FontAwesome 5 and SVG icons.

The links aren’t properly formatted. It wrapped the link with square brackets instead of brackets.

`([1][/t/-/277694])` should be `([1](/t/-/277694))` → ([1](https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/277694))

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/ai-summarization-doesnt-properly-format-links/277695)._