Posting here to get advice on self-hosted instance, if someone uses Akamai WAF that blocks any code snippet from posting in a topic? For example, in composer following code is identified as malicious or XSS code. /home/abyss/anaconda3/lib/ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib Can I re…

[imagem] Hyan: Can I remove Akamai WAF layer, trust and rely on Discourse security protection capability? Yes, we recommending running Discourse without a WAF in front. Those were created to front legacy applications that had to be exposed to the web.

Thanks, @Falco . I don’t quite understand if there’s a clear border between legacy application and modern (Discourse like single page application?) when it comes to security. I need to learn more such as Defend Your SPA from Security Woes | Okta Developer to feel more solid.

Configuração do Akamai WAF e falso positivo

Suporte

Falco (Falco) Março 17, 2025, 5:07pm 3

Sim, recomendamos executar o Discourse sem um WAF na frente. Estes foram criados para aplicações legadas que precisavam ser expostas à web.

Tópico		Respostas	Visualizações
Cloudflare Security WAF (Web Application Firewall) + Discourse? Support	1	512	25 de Junho de 2025
Discourse + Web Application Firewall (WAF) mod_security Self-hosting unsupported-install , hosting	8	3650	20 de Novembro de 2019
Using Discourse with Cloudflare: Best Practices Self-Hosting how-to , cloudflare	28	5550	26 de Abril de 2026
How to build a Discourse Installation with an Open Source WAF Self-hosting unsupported-install	1	1883	5 de Outubro de 2019
ModSecurity exceptions Support	5	715	8 de Agosto de 2019

Configuração do Akamai WAF e falso positivo

Tópicos relacionados