# Alternative a ❤ per promuovere/sostenere i post?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/alternatives-to-for-promoting-supporting-posts/84342>\
**Category:** Community Building\
**Created:** [1 Aprile 2018, 8:21pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/alternatives-to-for-promoting-supporting-posts/84342 "2018-04-01T20:21:27Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![icaria36](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/icaria36/32/426431_2.png) [@icaria36](https://meta.discourse.org/u/icaria36)\
**Post date:** [1 Aprile 2018, 8:21pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/alternatives-to-for-promoting-supporting-posts/84342/1 "2018-04-01T20:21:27Z")

</div>

Liking a first post is a good way to support or promote a topic. Using the paradigm of ❤ - _Like_ works pretty well in a forum like this one, mainly dedicated to “positive” topics.

However, today I found myself unable to “Like” a topic in our website, even if I really wanted to promote it and increase its potential visibility. The problem was that the topic featured [very sad news](https://la.confederac.io/t/dia-de-la-tierra-fuerte-represion-militar-israeli-deja-a-16-palestinos-asesinados-y-1-416-heridos/3273). I feared that “liking” the post could be interpreted as me supporting a massacre.

There is no lack of sad news, and some of them will be featured in sites with a Discourse forum. I wonder whether anyone has implemented or thought about implementing an alternative paradigm. For instance, a ⭐ would be more emotionally neutral but still supportive and clear.

It must be acknowledged that Twitter gets away with hearts as well, and there is no lack of sad news being promoted by users there. Facebook started with the famous 👍 “Like” only, but they addressed this problem some years ago by adding an array of emoticons, including sadness and anger.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/alternatives-to-for-promoting-supporting-posts/84342)._
