# Are TL3 and TL2 requirements too different?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/are-tl3-and-tl2-requirements-too-different/31353>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [July 23, 2015, 2:42pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/are-tl3-and-tl2-requirements-too-different/31353 "2015-07-23T14:42:15Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![alefattorini](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/alefattorini/32/119928_2.png) [@alefattorini](https://meta.discourse.org/u/alefattorini)\
**Post date:** [July 25, 2015, 11:27am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/are-tl3-and-tl2-requirements-too-different/31353/9 "2015-07-25T11:27:02Z")

</div>

> [@erlend\_sh](#):
>
> Member: You visit quite frequently, but you consume a fairly small amount of posts, specific to your likings.
> 
> Regular: You visit obsessively and you consume a large array of posts because you have a vested interest in the community.

Thanks guys! Great thoughts here, I just wondered if a level like “Good member” could exist. You’re not obsessed but anyway an active member, really interested.. Something between 827 and 32 😉

For example, I think to be a good member here. Really interested to a bunch of topics, sometimes I reply..and start a few. Not obsessed, it’s really hard here! Too much to read and write!

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/are-tl3-and-tl2-requirements-too-different/31353)._