# 自动挂起和所需字符是否非官方？
**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/auto-suspend-characters-required-are-not-official/90046
**Category:** Bug
**Created:** [2018年六月17日 03:28 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/auto-suspend-characters-required-are-not-official/90046 "2018-06-17T03:28:04Z")
**Posts on this page:** 7
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@itsbhanusharma](https://meta.discourse.org/u/itsbhanusharma)
#### Post date: [2018年六月17日 03:28 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/auto-suspend-characters-required-are-not-official/90046/1 "2018-06-17T03:28:04Z")
I’m using only the plugins published by discourse for maximum compatibility. However, I’m curious as to why the two plugins: discourse auto suspend & discourse characters required are not being marked as official?
I wasn’t sure where this topic belongs so posted it in uncategorized.
---
### Author:  [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)
#### Post date: [2018年六月17日 04:07 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/auto-suspend-characters-required-are-not-official/90046/2 "2018-06-17T04:07:54Z")
Oh that is odd, cc @eviltrout. And @blake is auto-suspend yours?
---
### Author:  [@eviltrout](https://meta.discourse.org/u/eviltrout)
#### Post date: [2018年六月18日 14:31 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/auto-suspend-characters-required-are-not-official/90046/3 "2018-06-18T14:31:33Z")
Looks like `characters-required` was never added to official plugins. This adds it:
>
---
### Author:  [@blake](https://meta.discourse.org/u/blake)
#### Post date: [2018年六月18日 16:39 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/auto-suspend-characters-required-are-not-official/90046/6 "2018-06-18T16:39:52Z")
I’ve updated the README for the auto-suspend plugin stating that it is unofficial and to use the auto-deactivate plugin instead:
>
I’ve add the auto-deactivate plugin to the official list:
[https://github.com/discourse/discourse/commit/9963078dd18e1cdf0f8113edf3349f4511c72373](https://github.com/discourse/discourse/commit/9963078dd18e1cdf0f8113edf3349f4511c72373)
---
### Author:  [@itsbhanusharma](https://meta.discourse.org/u/itsbhanusharma)
#### Post date: [2018年六月18日 16:42 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/auto-suspend-characters-required-are-not-official/90046/7 "2018-06-18T16:42:35Z")
> [@blake](#):
>
> [GitHub - discourse/discourse-auto-deactivate: This plugin will automatically deactivate stale users so that they need to recomfirm their email in order to login in again · GitHub](https://github.com/discourse/discourse-auto-deactivate)
@blake can you provide a small overview of what has changed between auto suspend and auto deactivate (despite the fact that one suspends and other deactivates) I’d have to install the other plugin tonight if there are major differences (Including support lifecycle)
---
### Author:  [@blake](https://meta.discourse.org/u/blake)
#### Post date: [2018年六月18日 16:51 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/auto-suspend-characters-required-are-not-official/90046/8 "2018-06-18T16:51:12Z")
> [@itsbhanusharma](#):
>
> can you provide a small overview of what has changed between auto suspend and auto deactivate
> [@Auto-suspend inactive users](https://meta.discourse.org/t/auto-suspend-inactive-users/65444/12):
>
> I’m not a huge fan of this approach, because a suspended user should mean they did something wrong. Having a ton of auto-suspended users mixed in randomly with users who were suspended for, I don’t know, abusive behavior or what have you, is quite far from ideal.
> [@itsbhanusharma](#):
>
> (despite the fact that one suspends and other deactivates)
That is the only difference and we don’t have plans to support the suspended plugin now that we don’t have any other paying customers using it.
---
### Author:  [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)
#### Post date: [2018年六月18日 23:04 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/auto-suspend-characters-required-are-not-official/90046/9 "2018-06-18T23:04:00Z")