When a backup to S3 runs nightly, it pretty much requires that the disk size be at least 2x the space used. On my 200GB disk, Discourse uses about 50% and during the backup, disk use jumps to just over 90% until the backup is uploaded to S3. [backups takong up disk space] I’m curious if there is …

There was a plan: Reduce local disk space needs by not (redundantly) gzipping backups [Bild] Reduce local disk space needs by not (redundantly) gzipping backups Development of that feature is currently paused and it isn’t on our current roadmap. I hope we will get to it in 2024.

Backup benötigt doppelt so viel Speicherplatz – könnte der Prozess verbessert werden?

Unterstützung

Ed_S (Ed S) 14. August 2025 um 07:51 2

Es gab einen Plan:
Reduzieren Sie den lokalen Festplattenspeicherbedarf, indem Sie Backups nicht (redundant) gzippen

Thema		Antworten	Aufrufe
Better auto-backup options Feature backups , s3	4	2048	4. Dezember 2025
How can I tell how much disk space might would be needed for an auto backup? Self-hosting server-resources	0	493	23. Juli 2020
'Download remote images to local' disabled despite enough free disk space Support	3	73	23. August 2025
Discourse not respecting the number of S3 backups to keep Self-hosting backups , s3	8	962	10. April 2024
Does using S3 for uploads mean redownloading all files when creating backups? Support	7	1292	13. September 2020

Backup benötigt doppelt so viel Speicherplatz – könnte der Prozess verbessert werden?

Verwandte Themen