Our Discourse site has more than 10k users and about 700 daily engaged users. users sending an average of 10k posts per day. our community has more than 160k pageviews/day including crawlers and anonymous users. Almost all of our users are connected to us via mobile devices. We ran community in sta…

Thanks @marianord , Unfortunately, we do not use CDN. The upload rate in our forum is not very high. Most of the time, users talk about various subjects. For example, in the last year, we had about 2.8 million posts and 2.7 million likes, but only 25gb of files are uploaded. Do you think that accord…

I disagree with @marianord . I don’t think that a CDN would make a noticeable difference with respect to the load on your server. These are just static files and they are not heavy to serve at all.

CDN and S3 are two different things. S3 offloads the files and backups to another server that is managed by a cloud provider (really high level summary) CDN caches the statics files of your server (images, JS, CSS) to server from multiple servers (PoP) around the globe to speed up the loading of t…

[Bild] marianord: you’re reducing the amount of requests that get to your server therefore reducing the load A request for a static file does not have a large impact on the overall server load. The requests for dynamic content are the heavy ones. [Bild] marianord: It’s a lot easier to se…

True, but Discourse has a few exceptions, like stylesheets that are served by ruby, so having a caching CDN means those requests doesn’t use up the unicorn processes. Regarding the OP problem, the first thing needed is having someone knowledgeable do some performance analysis during peak hours and …

[Bild] RGJ: Why are you talking about json files in a CDN context? I’m saying that the JSON requests will hit the server, the static ones won’t.

Thanks for your guidance, until a few months ago we used the Cloudflare CDN service and made good changes to the static content through the page rules. After it, I read somewhere that using proxies like Cloudflare drastically reduces the performance of the discourse, so we disabled it. Yesterday we…

This may be older information, but I do recall reading that discourse prefers a lower number of more powerful CPU’s vs a higher number of lower powered ones… even if you update the number of unicorn workers. @codinghorror , can you confirm if this information is still accurate?

Yes, that is correct, core CPU power is important, but it improves overall speed. @nildarar is having a performance bottleneck and that needs a different approach.

Are there any special tools for identifying discourse performance bottlenecks? [image] htop screen sorted by CPU usage Our forecast is that next year the number of our users will triple, so from today, we must provide the necessary resources for this scale.

Beste Konfigurationen zur Beschleunigung von Standalone Discourse

Unterstützung Installation

sam (Sam Saffron) 13. Oktober 2020 um 07:49 21

Die Warteschlange bedeutet, dass Sie mehr Web-Worker verwenden können.

Außerdem wirken Ihre Medianzeiten recht hoch. Können Sie dies auf einer schnelleren CPU testen?

Thema		Antworten	Aufrufe
My discourse speed is very slow Self-hosting	24	5363	4. März 2021
Our discourse overload because of a custom plugin. Please help me Self-hosting hosting	46	2604	22. August 2022
Due to extreme load, this is temporarily being shown to everyone... when it's not really the case Self-hosting server-resources	19	1983	21. Juli 2023
Are there any commands that will speed up the site? Support	19	2548	2. Dezember 2020
Discourse installation has been getting slower and slower and slower Self-hosting server-resources	36	2098	15. April 2023

Beste Konfigurationen zur Beschleunigung von Standalone Discourse

Verwandte Themen