# Beste praktijken voor "herzien en verduidelijken van de top 100 meest bezochte onderwerpen."

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/best-practices-for-revisit-and-clarify-the-top-100-most-visited-topics/271462
**Category:** Community Building
**Created:** [12 juli 2023 om 19:03 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/best-practices-for-revisit-and-clarify-the-top-100-most-visited-topics/271462 "2023-07-12T19:03:49Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Bas](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/bas/32/294929_2.png) [@Bas](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Bas)
#### Post date: [13 juli 2023 om 10:43 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/best-practices-for-revisit-and-clarify-the-top-100-most-visited-topics/271462/3 "2023-07-13T10:43:02Z")

</div>

> [@ganncamp](#):
>
> I’m deeply reluctant to edit an OP to consolidate the thread’s collective wisdom.

I’d love to understand a bit more on why you are reluctant?

Here on Meta, changing the content of a post is something that happens often. It is explicitly a power granted by the [different trust levels](https://blog.discourse.org/2018/06/understanding-discourse-trust-levels/).  
(Trust Level 3 grants editing titles & categories; TL4 allows full edits)

* * *

But assuming you have your reasons 🙂

I don’t really think a staff notice is the way to go. It feels a bit too in-your-face and I don’t think they are included in the community search (which is a main benefit of rewriting).

My preferred approaches would be:

- Reply with a complete question/answer post and mark it as the official solution (assuming you’re using [Discourse Solved](https://meta.discourse.org/t/discourse-solved/30155))
- Post a fresh topic, linking the old one

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/best-practices-for-revisit-and-clarify-the-top-100-most-visited-topics/271462)._