# Blog posts would be nicer if authored by an identifiable person

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/blog-posts-would-be-nicer-if-authored-by-an-identifiable-person/385174
**Category:** Site feedback
**Created:** [October 9, 2025, 6:33pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/blog-posts-would-be-nicer-if-authored-by-an-identifiable-person/385174 "2025-10-09T18:33:11Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![nathank](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/nathank/32/290039_2.png) [@nathank](https://meta.discourse.org/u/nathank)
#### Post date: [October 9, 2025, 6:33pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/blog-posts-would-be-nicer-if-authored-by-an-identifiable-person/385174/1 "2025-10-09T18:33:11Z")

</div>

I’ve noticed over the last wee while that the linked topics to blog posts have @Discourse as the ‘owner’, regardless of who authored the blog.

This somewhat impairs the community experience here on [meta.discourse.org](http://meta.discourse.org):

1. It feels less intimate

2. the author isn’t notified for replies

These make me far less likely to engage on those topics, and I suspect I’m not alone.

Of note, some original blog articles (such as [Behind the Scenes: Our 2025 Prague Meetup](http://blog.discourse.org/2025/10/behind-the-scenes-our-2025-prague-meetup)) are ‘authored’ by “The Discourse Team”. This is even more offputting!

One of the strengths of CDCK is that you are _not_ a bunch of faceless workers, but real people that fanboys like me can get to know.

To quote that blog post:

> This is a core part of the Discourse value system: that as a company and a culture, we believe in human connections. We’re dedicated to recreating those connections online

I’d encourage you to lean in to this more on the blog site and on meta!

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/blog-posts-would-be-nicer-if-authored-by-an-identifiable-person/385174)._
