# 더 이상 접근할 수 없는 주제에 대한 북마크가 여전히 존재합니다

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/bookmarks-still-exist-for-topics-you-no-longer-have-access-to/391822
**Category:** UX
**Tags:** bookmarks
**Created:** [12월 20, 2025, 9:15오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/bookmarks-still-exist-for-topics-you-no-longer-have-access-to/391822 "2025-12-20T21:15:49Z")
**Posts on this page:** 4
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![JammyDodger](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/jammydodger/32/254611_2.png) [@JammyDodger](https://meta.discourse.org/u/JammyDodger)
#### Post date: [12월 20, 2025, 9:15오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/bookmarks-still-exist-for-topics-you-no-longer-have-access-to/391822/1 "2025-12-20T21:15:49Z")

</div>

[내 통계](https://meta.discourse.org/u/jammydodger/summary)에는 책갈피가 4개 있다고 나와 있습니다:

 ![4 bookmarks](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/4X/3/1/1/311a1bfafb25ff57ee6f3a182a037fce91b90b63.jpeg)

하지만 내 책갈피 페이지에는 아무것도 없습니다: 🤷

 ![no bookmarks](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/4X/9/f/7/9f70374c02f06accc5515811a2cf8f64ce8b945c.jpeg)

그 4개의 토픽이나 DM에 더 이상 접근할 수 없기 때문이라고 생각합니다.

만약 그렇다면… 🙂 더 이상 접근할 수 없는 책갈피의 경우, 본인이 직접 삭제할 수 없으므로 해당 책갈피 통계도 자동으로 초기화되는 것이 적절할 것 같습니다.

**수정:**'통계에 접근할 수 없는 책갈피는 포함되지 않아야 한다’라고 표현하는 것이 더 명확할 수도 있습니다.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![zogstrip](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/zogstrip/32/512781_2.png) [@zogstrip](https://meta.discourse.org/u/zogstrip)
#### Post date: [12월 24, 2025, 10:52오전 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/bookmarks-still-exist-for-topics-you-no-longer-have-access-to/391822/3 "2025-12-24T10:52:46Z")

</div>

잘하셨네요 @JammyDodger 👏

이것은 다음으로 수정됩니다.

> <https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/36856>
>
> Previously, \`UserSummary#bookmark\_count\` used a simple database count
> that incl…uded all bookmarks regardless of whether the user could still
> access the bookmarked content. This led to inflated counts when:
> 
> \- Topics were moved to private categories the user can't access
> \- Topics or posts were soft-deleted
> \- Access was revoked for any other reason
> 
> The fix delegates counting to \`BookmarkQuery#count\_all\`, which applies
> the same permission checks used when listing bookmarks. This ensures
> the count shown on user profiles matches what users can actually see.
> 
> To avoid duplicating query logic, the existing \`list\_all\` method was
> refactored to extract \`build\_list\_queries\` as a shared helper. The
> \`unread\_notifications\` method was also cleaned up by breaking out
> several smaller private methods for better readability.
> 
> Ref - https://meta.discourse.org/t/391822

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![zogstrip](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/zogstrip/32/512781_2.png) [@zogstrip](https://meta.discourse.org/u/zogstrip)
#### Post date: [1월 21, 2026, 4:23오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/bookmarks-still-exist-for-topics-you-no-longer-have-access-to/391822/4 "2026-01-21T16:23:05Z")

</div>

@here 위쪽 👆 PR이 병합되었습니다 :git_merged:

* * *

 ![2026-01-21 @ 16.24.43](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/4X/7/3/9/73976424fabd1f430a01eb20db0c159596cf15d7.png)

북마크가 사라졌습니다 🔥

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![zogstrip](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/zogstrip/32/512781_2.png) [@zogstrip](https://meta.discourse.org/u/zogstrip)
#### Post date: [1월 24, 2026, 7:01오전 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/bookmarks-still-exist-for-topics-you-no-longer-have-access-to/391822/6 "2026-01-24T07:01:01Z")

</div>

이 주제는 2일 후 자동으로 닫혔습니다. 더 이상 새로운 답변이 허용되지 않습니다.