# Bringing a suspended user back on probation
**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/bringing-a-suspended-user-back-on-probation/23524
**Category:** Community Building
**Created:** [29 Dicembre 2014, 10:54pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/bringing-a-suspended-user-back-on-probation/23524 "2014-12-29T22:54:46Z")
**Posts on this page:** 6
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@dfabulich](https://meta.discourse.org/u/dfabulich)
#### Post date: [29 Dicembre 2014, 10:54pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/bringing-a-suspended-user-back-on-probation/23524/1 "2014-12-29T22:54:47Z")
A user on our forum was temporarily suspended for sending inappropriate private messages. He’s sent in an appeal in which he claims to understand what he did wrong and promises not to do it again.
Would it be possible to re-enable his account but put him in temporary probation? i.e. force him back into Trust Level 0 for a few months, or just temporarily revoke his right to send private messages?
---
### Author:  [@mcwumbly](https://meta.discourse.org/u/mcwumbly)
#### Post date: [29 Dicembre 2014, 10:57pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/bringing-a-suspended-user-back-on-probation/23524/2 "2014-12-29T22:57:34Z")
Yes, you should be able to do that:
> [@Punitive measures against idiots - locking trust level](https://meta.discourse.org/t/punitive-measures-against-idiots-locking-trust-level/20549/12):
>
> OK, trust level locking is now in, you can lock anyone at any trust level! Rumor is @codinghorror is planning trustholing a problem user as well, so we now know of at least 2 places where this feature will be used slight_smile Keep in mind once you trusthole a user, they are locked there forever until you hit the unlock button.
---
### Author:  [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)
#### Post date: [29 Dicembre 2014, 11:01pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/bringing-a-suspended-user-back-on-probation/23524/3 "2014-12-29T23:01:34Z")
Yes as @mcwumbly noted this is possible.. but
1. how will you know if he is reformed if he has no opportunity to make the same mistake again
2. it sends a weird message to bring someone back partially, like you don’t _really_ trust them.. better to send the message that you _do_ trust them and see what happens.
Just MHO on the last two points. Your site, your rules.
---
### Author:  [@purldator](https://meta.discourse.org/u/purldator)
#### Post date: [29 Dicembre 2014, 11:59pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/bringing-a-suspended-user-back-on-probation/23524/4 "2014-12-29T23:59:38Z")
> [@codinghorror](#):
>
> it sends a weird message to bring someone back partially, like you don’t really trust them.. better to send the message that you do trust them and see what happens.
And I think you also mentioned admins can see all ‘private’ messages anyway. Just a few clicks and the admin can keep a watchful eye. Also to make sure all members know to flag any personal messages too so the infraction is caught, if it ever happens again.
---
### Author:  [@system](https://meta.discourse.org/u/system)
#### Post date: [27 Agosto 2018, 7:28am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/bringing-a-suspended-user-back-on-probation/23524/5 "2018-08-27T07:28:40Z")
---
### Author:  [@sam](https://meta.discourse.org/u/sam)
#### Post date: [28 Agosto 2018, 12:53am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/bringing-a-suspended-user-back-on-probation/23524/6 "2018-08-28T00:53:28Z")