# Can emoji be rendered with absolute URLs?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/can-emoji-be-rendered-with-absolute-urls/47250>\
**Category:** Bug\
**Created:** [Juillet 13, 2016, 9:11 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/can-emoji-be-rendered-with-absolute-urls/47250 "2016-07-13T21:11:02Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sam](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/sam/32/102149_2.png) [@sam](https://meta.discourse.org/u/sam)\
**Post date:** [Juillet 14, 2016, 10:36 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/can-emoji-be-rendered-with-absolute-urls/47250/3 "2016-07-14T10:36:32Z")

</div>

☹ yeah `frowning2` should definitely be a fully qualified URL in `cooked` as are all the rest of the images. Also it is a bug it is not using the CDN.

@zogstrip maybe have a look at this, recently you played around in this area?

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/can-emoji-be-rendered-with-absolute-urls/47250)._