# Kann Mathjax auf Version 3 aktualisiert werden?

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/can-mathjax-be-upgraded-to-version-3/393637
**Category:** Support
**Tags:** math
**Created:** [3. November 2023 um 21:01 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/can-mathjax-be-upgraded-to-version-3/393637 "2023-11-03T21:01:22Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![sam](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/sam/32/102149_2.png) [@sam](https://meta.discourse.org/u/sam)
#### Post date: [16. Januar 2026 um 05:45 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/can-mathjax-be-upgraded-to-version-3/393637/3 "2026-01-16T05:45:15Z")

</div>

Wir sind jetzt auf Version 4.1 von Mathjax 🎊

> [@A new release of Discourse Math](https://meta.discourse.org/t/a-new-release-of-discourse-math/393633):
>
> I am very happy to announce a major upgrade to our Discourse Math plugin! Special thanks goes to @mcmcclur who helped test and build much of the new and upgraded [discourse-math](https://meta.discourse.org/t/discourse-math/65770?tl=en). This is a very significant change – we upgraded all the way from version 2.x up to version 4.1 of MathJax, catching up with years of features and advances. Additionally, we amended our design to make it significantly easier to upgrade the plugin in the future. Our new iteration is much friendlier to LLM outputs, whic…

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/can-mathjax-be-upgraded-to-version-3/393637)._