# Catch-All Issue for Reply in Email **URL:** \ **Category:** Product Support\ **Created:** [12 Marzo 2017, 12:51am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/catch-all-issue-for-reply-in-email/58909 "2017-03-12T00:51:07Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 1
**Author:** ![jylinman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/jylinman/32/68883_2.png) [@jylinman](https://meta.discourse.org/u/jylinman)\ **Post date:** [12 Marzo 2017, 12:51am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/catch-all-issue-for-reply-in-email/58909/1 "2017-03-12T00:51:07Z")
So I am currently setting everything up on AWS for discourse, and because I need to comply with certain laws I need to have the email hosted on it as well using WorkMail. Now, as of right now workmail doesn’t have a catch all address and can’t let me create a rule to redirect / forward an email when it was sent to an address that doesn’t exist. There are some hacky solutions I could do in terms of publishing something to SES and posting with discourse API, but I was wondering if someone has any thoughts on how to fix this so users can reply / start topics by email? Another solution, is there a way to setup discourse to send it to an email address (like [replies@site.com](mailto:replies@site.com)) and CC it to the actual email needed for the topic (like [site+jfNEKSKJFwlkvjdlsjkl@site.com](mailto:site+jfNEKSKJFwlkvjdlsjkl@site.com))? Thanks, Jon --- _[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/catch-all-issue-for-reply-in-email/58909)._