# CDCK/MoM 引用了 User1、User2 等帖子——是 LLM 质量问题吗？

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/cdck-mom-cites-posts-as-user1-user2-etc-llm-quality-issue/409526
**Category:** Bug
**Tags:** ai, ai-summarize
**Created:** [2026 年8 月 7 日 13:34 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/cdck-mom-cites-posts-as-user1-user2-etc-llm-quality-issue/409526 "2026-08-07T13:34:11Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Falco](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/falco/32/179432_2.png) [@Falco](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Falco)
#### Post date: [2026 年8 月 10 日 16:49 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/cdck-mom-cites-posts-as-user1-user2-etc-llm-quality-issue/409526/4 "2026-08-10T16:49:01Z")

</div>

感谢报告，这个 PR 处理了这个问题：

> <https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/42445>
>
> Previously, the summarizer agent's few-shot example used a two-post toy thread w…hose format didn't match the prompts the summarization strategies actually build, and the system prompt described a post format (\`N) username message\`) that no strategy emits.
> 
> This change replaces the example with one mirroring a real captured request (discussion title line, posts inside \`\<input\>\</input\>\` tags in the real \`(N username said: ...\` format) paired with a multi-paragraph cited summary demonstrating \`\[username\]({resource\_url}/N)\` citations, and fixes the post format description to match what the topic, chat, and gist strategies actually send.

该主题的摘要现在看起来更好了。

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/cdck-mom-cites-posts-as-user1-user2-etc-llm-quality-issue/409526)._