# Check for similar posts should ignore private topics

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/check-for-similar-posts-should-ignore-private-topics/47678
**Category:** Feature
**Created:** [July 23, 2016, 9:54am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/check-for-similar-posts-should-ignore-private-topics/47678 "2016-07-23T09:54:53Z")
**Posts on this page:** 3
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Sander78](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/sander78/32/296615_2.png) [@Sander78](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Sander78)
#### Post date: [July 23, 2016, 9:54am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/check-for-similar-posts-should-ignore-private-topics/47678/1 "2016-07-23T09:54:53Z")

</div>

Steps to reproduce:

- Write a reply in a private topic
- Copy/paste that reply in a public topic
- The post will be refused because it’s to similar to a post written before

Context:  
I asked @codinghorror to reopen a topic and when he wrote me he did (private topic) I accidentally wrote the text I wanted to post in the reopened topic in the private topic. I then copy/pasted that text into the reopened topic, but was not allowed to.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![codinghorror](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/codinghorror/32/110067_2.png) [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)
#### Post date: [July 23, 2016, 11:32am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/check-for-similar-posts-should-ignore-private-topics/47678/2 "2016-07-23T11:32:40Z")

</div>

I view this as a correct behavior. Only spammers would be placing the exact same text in a PM and a public message 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Sander78](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/sander78/32/296615_2.png) [@Sander78](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Sander78)
#### Post date: [July 23, 2016, 2:30pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/check-for-similar-posts-should-ignore-private-topics/47678/3 "2016-07-23T14:30:31Z")

</div>

Alright, I can accept that, it was a pretty rare case already. 🙂
