# Combining trust system and pre-moderation

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/combining-trust-system-and-pre-moderation/4556>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Tags:** completed\
**Created:** [3월 7, 2013, 6:10오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/combining-trust-system-and-pre-moderation/4556 "2013-03-07T18:10:59Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![frandallfarmer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/frandallfarmer/32/102170_2.png) [@frandallfarmer](https://meta.discourse.org/u/frandallfarmer)\
**Post date:** [3월 7, 2013, 6:20오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/combining-trust-system-and-pre-moderation/4556/2 "2013-03-07T18:20:30Z")

</div>

> [@aja](#):
>
> Another idea would be to publish all 0-level posts immediately, but require a click to display the post. If enough users read the post without flagging it

This is an interesting idea - in effect the “flag” permission/trust level could include a pre-screening method.

Why not go ahead and display the post (without a click) with a special color/format (grey on grey) only to users of the “flagging” trust level, indicating that it hasn’t been approved, and provide a single click to approve or flag it. That’s what you’re really looking for - a pass/fail snap-judgement. Like with flagging, keep a count of “approved” and when the threshold is reached, it becomes a full fledged post.

I’m not sure how this would interact with the new posts indicators, though… And there are probably other side effects.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/combining-trust-system-and-pre-moderation/4556)._