# Combining trust system and pre-moderation

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/combining-trust-system-and-pre-moderation/4556>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Tags:** completed\
**Created:** [7 Marzo, 2013 18:10 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/combining-trust-system-and-pre-moderation/4556 "2013-03-07T18:10:59Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aja](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/aja/32/103616_2.png) [@aja](https://meta.discourse.org/u/aja)\
**Post date:** [7 Marzo, 2013 18:45 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/combining-trust-system-and-pre-moderation/4556/3 "2013-03-07T18:45:08Z")

</div>

> [@frandallfarmer](#):
>
> Why not go ahead and display the post (without a click) with a special color/format (grey on grey) only to users of the “flagging” trust level, indicating that it hasn’t been approved, and provide a single click to approve or flag it.

That could work… it would be less important to “hide” the text if it was otherwise clear that this was an un-vetted post from a user who may or may not fit the established community norms. Allowing trusted users to quickly approve or disapprove these posts could also accelerate the determination of trust for the 0-level user, as users would be quicker to execute the simple pass/fail actions than they would be the more fraught like/flag actions. Hmm!

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/combining-trust-system-and-pre-moderation/4556)._