# Discourse for Teams 与 Discourse 的比较

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/comparing-discourse-for-teams-with-discourse/168423
**Category:** Community Building
**Created:** [2020年十月27日 18:00 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/comparing-discourse-for-teams-with-discourse/168423 "2020-10-27T18:00:17Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![hellekin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/hellekin/32/51636_2.png) [@hellekin](https://meta.discourse.org/u/hellekin)
#### Post date: [2020年十一月18日 12:21 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/comparing-discourse-for-teams-with-discourse/168423/7 "2020-11-18T12:21:14Z")

</div>

感谢您进行这一比较。

我认为有必要提及，对于不愿或无法使用 AWS 的欧洲用户，存在 GDPR 限制\[1\]。

> [@Discourse for Teams is here!](https://meta.discourse.org/t/discourse-for-teams-is-here/168390/15?u=hellekin):
>
> Is there an Onpremise or european GDPR\* ok solution \*Regarding the standard clauses, we do not have the opportunity to assess in detail legislation in every third country, but in the case of the United States, we are leaning towards the reasons for the judgment in Schrems II. The reasons for the ruling mean that the possibility of using an American personal data assistant, regardless of the contractual stage, is currently virtually non-existent. So AWS, GCP, Azure etc is not GDPR complient

> [@jomaxro](#):
>
> 我们确实使用 AWS S3 进行文件上传，因此如果您无法使用任何 AWS 服务，Teams 可能不太适合您。

* * *

1. 同时记录在 AWS 之外设置和使用 S3 也很有必要——这一直在我待办事项清单上……：(

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/comparing-discourse-for-teams-with-discourse/168423)._