# Consolidated Pageviews accuracy

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/consolidated-pageviews-accuracy/107193>\
**Category:** Data & reporting\
**Created:** [January 22, 2019, 4:51pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/consolidated-pageviews-accuracy/107193 "2019-01-22T16:51:54Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![L30110](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/eb9ed0/32.png) [@L30110](https://meta.discourse.org/u/L30110)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2019, 4:51pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/consolidated-pageviews-accuracy/107193/1 "2019-01-22T16:51:54Z")

</div>

Not sure if this really relates to the consolidated view or a more basic issue, but I’m seeing the stats claim a lot of “anonymous user” page views on my site, which ONLY permits access by logged-in users. Other than pages like privacy policy, TOS, etc. which I’d like to block from non-logged in users (but can’t in Discourse currently), no other pages are accessible at all unless you’re logged in. The crawler count is similarly suspect, but with a much smaller actual count.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/consolidated-pageviews-accuracy/107193)._