# Consolidated Pageviews accuracy

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/consolidated-pageviews-accuracy/107193>\
**Category:** Data & reporting\
**Created:** [January 22, 2019, 4:51pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/consolidated-pageviews-accuracy/107193 "2019-01-22T16:51:54Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TheBestPessimist](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/thebestpessimist/32/247704_2.png) [@TheBestPessimist](https://meta.discourse.org/u/TheBestPessimist)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2019, 6:05am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/consolidated-pageviews-accuracy/107193/6 "2019-01-23T06:05:42Z")

</div>

> [@Falco](#):
>
> That is **Logged in users PAGEVIEWS**

Apparently that text is not _that intuitive_.

Would

> from Crawlers  
> from Logged in users  
> from Anonymous cowards

look simpler to understand @10ColorsTenkara and @L30110 ?

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/consolidated-pageviews-accuracy/107193)._