# Constructive Discussion and Dialectic

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/constructive-discussion-and-dialectic/2804>\
**Category:** Site feedback\
**Created:** [11. Februar 2013 um 18:06 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/constructive-discussion-and-dialectic/2804 "2013-02-11T18:06:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![codinghorror](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/codinghorror/32/110067_2.png) [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)\
**Post date:** [12. Februar 2013 um 05:21 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/constructive-discussion-and-dialectic/2804/2 "2013-02-12T05:21:30Z")

</div>

Have you seen what The Economist does here? It’s the most advanced treatment I have encountered but it is extremely moderation intensive.

[http://www.economist.com/debate/debates/overview/246](http://www.economist.com/debate/debates/overview/246)

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/constructive-discussion-and-dialectic/2804)._