# Core Plugin reversal procedure

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/core-plugin-reversal-procedure/375307>\
**Category:** Product Support\
**Created:** [July 22, 2025, 8:43pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/core-plugin-reversal-procedure/375307 "2025-07-22T20:43:42Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ethsim2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/ethsim2/32/522255_2.png) [@Ethsim2](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Ethsim2)\
**Post date:** [July 23, 2025, 8:24am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/core-plugin-reversal-procedure/375307/3 "2025-07-23T08:24:48Z")

</div>

Interesting reply. However, without sophisticated scanning of the database for “plugin requirement”, there would be no “HINT” that many users relied on during the failed rebuild processes

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/core-plugin-reversal-procedure/375307)._