# Could a link density metric be useful?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/could-a-link-density-metric-be-useful/89818>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [13 ביוני,‏ 2018,‏ 10:04pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/could-a-link-density-metric-be-useful/89818 "2018-06-13T22:04:57Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tophee](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/tophee/32/73406_2.png) [@tophee](https://meta.discourse.org/u/tophee)\
**Post date:** [13 ביוני,‏ 2018,‏ 10:04pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/could-a-link-density-metric-be-useful/89818/1 "2018-06-13T22:04:57Z")

</div>

I guess we all agree that cross-linking topics/posts and quoting across topics is beneficial to a forum. It just occurred to me that the degree of linking between topics could also be an interesting metric for a forum.

What do you think?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![codinghorror](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/codinghorror/32/110067_2.png) [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)\
**Post date:** [14 ביוני,‏ 2018,‏ 4:35am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/could-a-link-density-metric-be-useful/89818/2 "2018-06-14T04:35:19Z")

</div>

Mostly for identifying FAQs, but yes.
