# Portal 未来能否成为嵌入式的替代方案？

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/could-portal-be-an-alternative-to-embedding-in-the-future/117417>\
**Category:** UX\
**Created:** [2019年五月10日 18:16 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/could-portal-be-an-alternative-to-embedding-in-the-future/117417 "2019-05-10T18:16:52Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stephen](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/stephen/32/95011_2.png) [@Stephen](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Stephen)\
**Post date:** [2019年五月10日 18:16 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/could-portal-be-an-alternative-to-embedding-in-the-future/117417/1 "2019-05-10T18:16:52Z")

</div>

ZDNet is touting this as new, but the majority of the discussion began at the 2018 Chrome Summit. Might there be an advantage to using `<portal>` to embed discussions and ‘seamlessly’ transition users between content and discussion?

> **[Google launches Portals, a new web page navigation system for Chrome](https://www.zdnet.com/article/google-launches-portals-a-new-web-page-navigation-system-for-chrome/)**
>
> Google Chrome developers launch new iframe replacement tech.

It’s already in Chrome 76, has anyone experimented with this yet?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![codinghorror](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/codinghorror/32/110067_2.png) [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)\
**Post date:** [2019年五月11日 03:58 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/could-portal-be-an-alternative-to-embedding-in-the-future/117417/2 "2019-05-11T03:58:59Z")

</div>

What existing problem is this trying to solve? I am unclear.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AndreSpecker](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/andrespecker/32/139050_2.png) [@AndreSpecker](https://meta.discourse.org/u/AndreSpecker)\
**Post date:** [2019年五月11日 10:06 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/could-portal-be-an-alternative-to-embedding-in-the-future/117417/3 "2019-05-11T10:06:55Z")

</div>

I believe he is suggesting that technology be used in the source of discourse

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![codinghorror](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/codinghorror/32/110067_2.png) [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)\
**Post date:** [2019年五月11日 11:29 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/could-portal-be-an-alternative-to-embedding-in-the-future/117417/4 "2019-05-11T11:29:09Z")

</div>

That is not what I asked.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hifihedgehog](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/hifihedgehog/32/140207_2.png) [@Hifihedgehog](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Hifihedgehog)\
**Post date:** [2019年五月11日 13:36 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/could-portal-be-an-alternative-to-embedding-in-the-future/117417/5 "2019-05-11T13:36:35Z")

</div>

Iframes, apparently.

 ![image](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/3X/6/0/6043745623cd66bce32e1be32d122c14b8409308.png)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sam](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/sam/32/102149_2.png) [@sam](https://meta.discourse.org/u/sam)\
**Post date:** [2019年五月13日 00:19 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/could-portal-be-an-alternative-to-embedding-in-the-future/117417/6 "2019-05-13T00:19:12Z")

</div>

We will not be adding support for portals anywhere until other browser vendors start implementing it.

The idea [according to the spec](https://github.com/WICG/portals/blob/master/explainer.md) is to enable seamless navigation to oneboxed content.

I would say this is multiple years out before we even consider adopting this for specific oneboxes, it is a chrome experiment for now.