# Create a "community management" category
**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/create-a-community-management-category/40307
**Category:** Site feedback
**Created:** [28 فبراير 2016، 10:44م UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/create-a-community-management-category/40307 "2016-02-28T22:44:09Z")
**Posts on this page:** 3
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@riking](https://meta.discourse.org/u/riking)
#### Post date: [28 فبراير 2016، 10:44م UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/create-a-community-management-category/40307/1 "2016-02-28T22:44:10Z")
Continuing the discussion from [Books on community building](https://meta.discourse.org/t/books-on-community-building/40029):
I’ve seen several topics about community building, and they’ve all been placed in `uncategorized` (and a portion have the #community-management::tag tag).
I think these posts are common enough, and there are enough existing topics, that they should get their own category.
---
### Author:  [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)
#### Post date: [28 فبراير 2016، 11:25م UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/create-a-community-management-category/40307/2 "2016-02-28T23:25:12Z")
Tag might be sufficient though.
It is almost like everything should be a tag until it is proven to be popular enough to warrant promotion to a category.
---
### Author:  [@riking](https://meta.discourse.org/u/riking)
#### Post date: [28 فبراير 2016، 11:28م UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/create-a-community-management-category/40307/3 "2016-02-28T23:28:02Z")
> [@codinghorror](#):
>
> It is almost like everything should be a tag until it is proven to be popular enough to warrant promotion to a category.
I certainly agree 🙂