# Discourse as SSO provider for multiple clients

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/discourse-as-sso-provider-for-multiple-clients/107610>\
**Category:** SSO\
**Created:** [1월 26, 2019, 4:23오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/discourse-as-sso-provider-for-multiple-clients/107610 "2019-01-26T16:23:43Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![unicom](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/unicom/32/128948_2.png) [@unicom](https://meta.discourse.org/u/unicom)\
**Post date:** [1월 26, 2019, 9:10오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/discourse-as-sso-provider-for-multiple-clients/107610/9 "2019-01-26T21:10:46Z")

</div>

My first scheme is not fully correct. This is more correct case:

 ![20](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/3X/d/4/d4b0d8301fba137c808ab96f25c331c1116604f2.jpeg)

violet arrows - SSO  
red arrows - comments  
Discourse 0 needed only for SSO, not for comments or discussions.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/discourse-as-sso-provider-for-multiple-clients/107610)._