# Discourse Dynamic Groups **URL:** \ **Category:** Plugin\ **Created:** [May 8, 2025, 4:18pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/discourse-dynamic-groups/365342 "2025-05-08T16:18:18Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 30
**Author:** ![satonotdead](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/satonotdead/32/447830_2.png) [@satonotdead](https://meta.discourse.org/u/satonotdead)\ **Post date:** [September 13, 2026, 11:53am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/discourse-dynamic-groups/365342/30 "2026-09-13T11:53:45Z")
> [@RGJ](#): > > That would not make sense from a functional point of view Of course I thought about it and understood that very likely for that reason the functionality is not active today. And I also clearly understand that the limitation would not be hard but soft. The intention is to limit users who maintain a very low conversation ratio, with their reading ratio being 5 or 10 times broader. A badges and user title that marks them and an exit path explained in a simple way can “wake them up”. I also know that it is common on the Internet for 90/97% to unintentionally fall into the group of _lurkers_, although I also know that this mechanism can motivate them, because they would be enabled to reply and contribute in other forums through a simple exit —providing three accepted answers as solutions— and not in the categories with the most traffic. Technically, something similar is what supports peer-to-peer exchange in networks like Torrent, which have been functioning among us for more than a decade. It is an experiment I would like to try, especially after seeing that the cheer points awarded are almost overwhelmingly granted based on reading time rather than contributions. I think it’s something interesting to discuss; maybe this can be achieved with simple adjustments to the Discourse core. --- _[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/discourse-dynamic-groups/365342)._