# DiscourseSkill.md

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/discourseskill-md/412958
**Category:** Development
**Created:** [September 22, 2026, 1:27am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/discourseskill-md/412958 "2026-09-22T01:27:32Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Moin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/moin/32/554653_2.png) [@Moin](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Moin)
#### Post date: [September 22, 2026, 12:34pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/discourseskill-md/412958/4 "2026-09-22T12:34:28Z")

</div>

What was your basis for creating this? Right at the beginning, it says it’s for plugins, themes, and theme components.

> <https://github.com/CodeWorksLabs/review-skills/blob/ac3dec86fd2326b9669d74e7998811a2e03c12e0/.agents/skills/codeworkslabs-platform-review/references/platforms/discourse/DiscourseSkill.md?plain=1#L3-L3>

But my impression is that the review scope doesn’t match the structure of themes. Why is `javascripts/` only included if it’s in an `assets` folder? Why are you restricting `settings.yml` to the `config` folder? Themes usually don’t have those.

It’s ironic how we discuss that AI-generated stuff might not meet the quality requirements, and the suggested solution doesn’t feel more reliable itself.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/discourseskill-md/412958)._