# הצג רשימת נושאים על פי מערך של מזהי נושאים
**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/display-list-of-topics-by-array-of-topics-ids/86778
**Category:** Development
**Created:** [4 במאי, 2018, 6:41pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/display-list-of-topics-by-array-of-topics-ids/86778 "2018-05-04T18:41:36Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 2
### Author:  [@spirobel](https://meta.discourse.org/u/spirobel)
#### Post date: [15 בפברואר, 2020, 12:03am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/display-list-of-topics-by-array-of-topics-ids/86778/2 "2020-02-15T00:03:14Z")
I also need this functionality. right now I am doing it like this, but this takes way too long.
```javascript
const selectedTopics = this.selectedTopics
//eat topics as ids and let out real topics
this.selectedTopicsID.forEach(function(tid,index){
Topic.find(tid,{}).then(results => {
selectedTopics.pushObject(results)
})
});
```
I am about to reopen the listcontroller in my plugin.rb and add a new endpoint and reopen the topic-list in the frontend initializer and do something similar to this:
[https://github.com/discourse/discourse/blob/master/app/assets/javascripts/discourse/models/topic-list.js.es6#L129](https://github.com/discourse/discourse/blob/master/app/assets/javascripts/discourse/models/topic-list.js.es6#L129)
But there must be an easier way to do this. Is there really no endpoint yet to fetch topics in bulk by id?
I would be very glad for some help 😃
EDIT: This is how I solved this problem for me:
[https://github.com/spirobel/projects/commit/b514a366f05005888805fc2f57118dfd9fd61fa1](https://github.com/spirobel/projects/commit/b514a366f05005888805fc2f57118dfd9fd61fa1)
This is how it can be used.
```javascript
import TopicList from 'discourse/models/topic-list';
const selectedTopics = this.selectedTopics
//eat topics as ids
TopicList.topics_array(this.selectedTopicsID).then(results => selectedTopics.pushObjects(results.topic_list.topics))
```
right now this still has the downside, that it doesnt return “real” Topic objects, but I guess adding a line like this will fix it:
>
I am still unsure if this is the right way to do it and/or if this breaks security.
Another thing that could be done: first look in the store if the record is already there and then only load what isnt there, with fromMap. Similar to:
>
anyways this is getting to verbose here 😃
This is my final solution I will call it a day now:
[https://github.com/spirobel/projects/commit/004da260f15486bf71ca48fa7c6ecee11ce646f0](https://github.com/spirobel/projects/commit/004da260f15486bf71ca48fa7c6ecee11ce646f0)
---
_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/display-list-of-topics-by-array-of-topics-ids/86778)._